From Lenin’s “Left-Wing” Communism – An Infantile Disorder (1920):
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1920/lwc/
“[E.g.,] Parliamentarianism has become “historically obsolete”. That is true in the propaganda sense. However, everybody knows that this is still a far cry from overcoming it in practice. Capitalism could have been declared – and with full justice – to be “historically obsolete” many decades ago, but that does not at all remove the need for a very long and very persistent struggle on the basis of capitalism.
[Read More]
notes on Lenin, The State and Revolution (1917)
I am writing with some notes towards discussion of Lenin’s The State and Revolution (1917).
The first point to make is that this is least controversial of the three texts by Lenin we read in the group, the other two being What is to be done? (1902) and “Left-Wing” Communism: an infantile disorder (1920). (Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism (1916) is also somewhat controversial.)
There are potentially 3 Lenins: vanguardist; utopian; and conservative.
[Read More]
Notes on Luxemburg's The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions (1906)
I am writing with some notes on Rosa Luxemburg’s Mass, Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions (1906), which we read as our second text from the period of the 1905 Revolution in Russia.
First, on the 1905 Revolution, it needs to be emphasized that this was not only a prelude to and “rehearsal” for the 1917 Russian Revolution, but was itself a world-historic event that was galvanizing for the international Left and workers movement, as well as giving shape to 20th Century political trends more generally.
[Read More]
notes on Lenin, What is to be done?---Platypus "neo-Leninism?"
I am writing with some notes and suggestions on Lenin’s What is to be done? (1902).
I’d like to start with a quotation from Lenin’s first footnote, in the chapter “Dogmatism and Freedom of Criticism:”
At the present time (as is now evident), the English Fabians, the French Ministerialists, the German Bernsteinians, and the Russian Critics all belong to the same family, all extol each other, learn from each other, and together take up arms against “dogmatic” Marxism.
[Read More]
notes on Feb. 15 reading Korsch "Marxism and Philosophy" (1923)
‘[Humanity] always sets itself only such problems as it can solve; since, looking at the matter more closely it will always be found that the problem itself arises only when the material conditions for its solution are already present or are at least understood to be in the process of emergence’ [Marx, Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)]. This dictum is not affected by the fact that a problem which supersedes present relations may have been formulated in an anterior epoch.
[Read More]
note on recent readings: Slaughter, Nettl, Luxemburg
After the recent discussion of Luxemburg’s pamphlet on Reform or Revolution? (1900/08), there might be some confusion regarding the relationship between Luxemburg’s formulations and the raison d’etre of Platypus as an organized project today.—What is the point of reading Luxemburg today?
Whereas Luxemburg was critiquing Eduard Bernstein and other “revisionists’” arguments that the development of capitalism had made proletarian social revolution superfluous or even harmful, Luxemburg was arguing that such historical “development” must be seen as symptomatic of the growing and deepening crisis of capitalism, and that the organized Marxist social-democratic labor and political movement must be seen as part of that history, part of that crisis.
[Read More]
University of Chicago Marxist reading group Winter-Spring 2009
Platypus chapter at University of Chicago[ meets Sundays at][ **]
[ Reynolds Club 5706 S. University Ave.] [ **2nd floor South Lounge
2-5PM**]
[For more information contact mtorre3@artic.edu]
[ **]
[PDF of 2008-2009 scheduled readings ###
[[January 25, 2009]]
[What is “revolutionary leadership?”]
[· Cliff Slaughter, “What is Revolutionary Leadership?” (1960)]
[· Rosa Luxemburg, “The Crisis of German Social Democracy” Part 1 (1915) [PDF]]
[ ]
[ ]
[ []]
[Read More]
SAIC reading group Spring 2009
Platypus chapter at SAIC[ meets Sundays at]
112 S. Michigan Ave. Room 707 @ 1-4pm
[contact: ian.morrison.a@gmail.com if you are not SAIC affiliated]
[PDF of 2008-2009 scheduled readings ###
[[January 25, 2009]]
[What is “revolutionary leadership?”]
[· Cliff Slaughter, “What is Revolutionary Leadership?” (1960)]
[· Rosa Luxemburg, “The Crisis of German Social Democracy” Part 1 (1915) [PDF]]
[ ]
[ ]
[ []]
[[[February 1, 2009]]]
[ ]
[[Revolutionary Marxism (1)]]
[Read More]
Obama and Clinton
"Third Way" politics and the "Left"
FOR THE “LEFT” that is critical of him, the most common comparison made of Obama is to Bill Clinton.
This critique of Obama, as of Clinton, denounces his “Centrism,” the trajectory he appears to continue from the “new” Democratic Party of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) expressed by Clinton and Gore’s election in 1992. Clinton’s election was seen as part of the triumph of “Third Way” politics that contemporaneously found expression in Tony Blair’s “New” Labour Party in Britain.
[Read More]
Capital in history
The need for a Marxian philosophy of history of the Left
The following is a talk given at the Marxist-Humanist Committee public forum on The Crisis in Marxist Thought, hosted by the Platypus Affiliated Society in Chicago on Friday, July 25th, 2008.
I want to speak about the meaning of history for any purportedly Marxian Left.
We in Platypus focus on the history of the Left because we think that the narrative one tells about this history is in fact one’s theory of the present.
[Read More]