IN RESPONSE TO THE CRITIQUES of Wayne Price and Liam Swenson to my piece on anarchism in The Platypus Review #65,1 I will reiterate what I consider the major differences between Marxist revolutionary theory and anarchism in general. I say in general because I see nothing to be gained by dealing with the great variety of differences within anarchism itself presented by these critiques. In fact their great variety proves the very fleeting and vacillating nature of the anarchist project.
[Read More]
Marxism and Anarchism
Radical Ideologies Today, Halifax
A panel discussion held at University of King’s College on 1st February, 2014. Sponsored by the King’s Student Union and Dalhousie Student Union
Audio Recording Your browser does not support the audio element Panelists Eva Curry – Stand
Christoph Lichtenberg – International Bolshevik Tendency
Chris Parsons – student activist
Alex Khasnabish – The Radical Imagination Project, Mount Saint Vincent University
Description It seems that there are still only two radical ideologies: Anarchism and Marxism.
[Read More]
Lenin and the Marxist Left after #Occupy
ON MARCH 31ST, 2012, the Platypus Affiliated Society invited Ben Lewis of the Communist Party of Great Britain and Tom Riley of the International Bolshevik Tendency to speak on the theme of “Lenin and the Marxist Left after #Occupy” at the 2012 Platypus International Convention held at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. The original description of the event reads as follows: “The occasion for this panel is, in part, Pham Binh’s recent critique of Tony Cliff’s biography of Lenin, which was circulated on the web and published in the Communist Party of Great Britain’s Weekly Worker, and the responses in on-going debate by Paul LeBlanc and Paul D’Amato.
[Read More]
1873--1973: The century of Marxism
The death of Marxism and the emergence of neo-liberalism and neo-anarchism
AT THE 2012 PLATYPUS AFFILIATED SOCIETY’S (PAS) annual International Convention, held at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago March 30–April 1, Chris Cutrone, President of the PAS, delivered the following presentation, which has been edited for clarity. A full audio recording is available online by clicking the above link.
IN THE TRADITION we established just two years ago, there is a Platypus President’s report, speaking to the historical moment.
[Read More]
Lenin and the Marxist Left after #Occupy
A panel discussion held at the 2012 Platypus International Convention on March 31st, 2012.
Audio Recording
Transcript in Platypus Review #47
Panelists
Ben Lewis—Communist Party of Great Britain
Tom Riley—International Bolshevik Tendency
Chris Cutrone (Moderator)—Platypus Affiliated Society
A destroyer of vulgar-Marxism
Book review: Karl Korsch, _Marxism and Philosophy_ (Leipzig: C.L. Hirschfeld, 1923)
Karl Kautsky’s 1924 review of Karl Korsch’s Marxism and Philosophy appears below in English for the first time.1 It is hoped that other reviews of Marxism and Philosophy will also be made available in the very near future, not least by leading German communists such as August Thalheimer. Given the highly disputed theoretical legacy of both Kautsky and Korsch, the publication of this review will doubtless add to the debate on the idea of a “coming of age” of Marxism in the late 1860s.
[Read More]
"Thirty years of counter-revolution"
_LAST SUMMER, SPENCER A. LEONARD interviewed Clyde Young, a veteran member of the Revolutionary Communist Party. The interview was broadcast on June 31, 2011 on the radio show Radical Minds on WHPK – FM Chicago. What follows is an edited transcript of their conversation. A shorter version of this interview ran in the broadsheet edition of Platypus Review issue 43._
Spencer A. Leonard: Everyone hears a lot about the 1960s, the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr.
[Read More]
The Relevance of Lenin Today
Audio Recording Your browser does not support the audio element Video Recording Transcript in Platypus Review #48
Description The Encyclopedia Britannica’s entry on Lenin states that,
If the Bolshevik Revolution is – as some people have called it – the most significant political event of the 20th century, then Lenin must for good or ill be considered the century’s most significant political leader. Not only in the scholarly circles of the former Soviet Union, but even among many non-Communist scholars, he has been regarded as both the greatest revolutionary leader and revolutionary statesman in history, as well as the greatest revolutionary thinker since Marx.
[Read More]
The Occupy movement, a renascent Left, and Marxism today
ON NOVEMBER 5, 2011, using questions formulated together with Chris Cutrone, Haseeb Ahmed interviewed Slavoj Žižek at the Jan van Eyck Academie in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The following is an edited transcript of their conversation.
Haseeb Ahmed: Are we currently – after Tahrir Square and the eruption of the Occupy movement – living through a renaissance of the Left? If so, what is the historical legacy that stands in need of reconsideration?
[Read More]
Lenin's politics
A rejoinder to David Adam on Lenin's liberalism
THE PRINCIPAL MISTAKE MADE by those who contemplate Lenin’s political thought and action is due to assumptions that are made about the relation of socialism to democracy. Lenin was not an “undemocratic socialist” or one who prioritized socialism as an “end” over the “means” of democracy. Lenin did not think that once a majority of workers was won to socialist revolution democracy was finished. Lenin was not an authoritarian socialist.1
[Read More]