I am writing with some brief, partial notes from our discussion at UChicago at yesterday’s (Sun. 3/8/09) reading group, on several essays from György Lukács’s 1923 book History and Class Consciousness.
I want to emphasize and discuss in particular a couple of passages, from the (original, 1922) Preface, and the essay “What is Orthodox Marxism?” (1919).
Specifically, I wish to discuss Lukács’s use of categories, “materialist dialectics,” and his meaning of Marxism as a “method,” which might otherwise prove confusing or tricky.
[Read More]
notes on Spartacists on Lenin and the vanguard party
I am writing with some notes and suggestions for discussion on the Spartacist League pamphlet on “Lenin and the vanguard party” (1978):
http://www.bolshevik.org/Pamphlets/LeninVanguard/LVP%200.htm
I’d like to quote at length from Spartacist founder James Robertson’s 1973 speech “In Defense of Democratic Centralism” that is included in the pamphlet as supplemental material (and is edited in the pamphlet but given in its entirety on-line):
http://www.bolshevik.org/Pamphlets/LeninVanguard/LVP%20Robertson%20to%20Spartacus-BL.htm
“What we are dealing with in the period from the founding of Iskra to the founding of the Bolshevik Party in 1912 is the transformation of the Bolshevik faction from a revolutionary social-democratic into an embryonic communist organization.
[Read More]
notes on Lenin, What is to be done?---Platypus "neo-Leninism?"
I am writing with some notes and suggestions on Lenin’s What is to be done? (1902).
I’d like to start with a quotation from Lenin’s first footnote, in the chapter “Dogmatism and Freedom of Criticism:”
At the present time (as is now evident), the English Fabians, the French Ministerialists, the German Bernsteinians, and the Russian Critics all belong to the same family, all extol each other, learn from each other, and together take up arms against “dogmatic” Marxism.
[Read More]
notes on Feb. 15 reading Korsch "Marxism and Philosophy" (1923)
‘[Humanity] always sets itself only such problems as it can solve; since, looking at the matter more closely it will always be found that the problem itself arises only when the material conditions for its solution are already present or are at least understood to be in the process of emergence’ [Marx, Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)]. This dictum is not affected by the fact that a problem which supersedes present relations may have been formulated in an anterior epoch.
[Read More]
University of Chicago Marxist reading group Winter-Spring 2009
Platypus chapter at University of Chicago[ meets Sundays at][ **]
[ Reynolds Club 5706 S. University Ave.] [ **2nd floor South Lounge
2-5PM**]
[For more information contact mtorre3@artic.edu]
[ **]
[PDF of 2008-2009 scheduled readings ###
[[January 25, 2009]]
[What is “revolutionary leadership?”]
[· Cliff Slaughter, “What is Revolutionary Leadership?” (1960)]
[· Rosa Luxemburg, “The Crisis of German Social Democracy” Part 1 (1915) [PDF]]
[ ]
[ ]
[ []]
[Read More]
SAIC reading group Spring 2009
Platypus chapter at SAIC[ meets Sundays at]
112 S. Michigan Ave. Room 707 @ 1-4pm
[contact: ian.morrison.a@gmail.com if you are not SAIC affiliated]
[PDF of 2008-2009 scheduled readings ###
[[January 25, 2009]]
[What is “revolutionary leadership?”]
[· Cliff Slaughter, “What is Revolutionary Leadership?” (1960)]
[· Rosa Luxemburg, “The Crisis of German Social Democracy” Part 1 (1915) [PDF]]
[ ]
[ ]
[ []]
[[[February 1, 2009]]]
[ ]
[[Revolutionary Marxism (1)]]
[Read More]
Capital in history
The need for a Marxian philosophy of history of the Left
The following is a talk given at the Marxist-Humanist Committee public forum on The Crisis in Marxist Thought, hosted by the Platypus Affiliated Society in Chicago on Friday, July 25th, 2008.
I want to speak about the meaning of history for any purportedly Marxian Left.
We in Platypus focus on the history of the Left because we think that the narrative one tells about this history is in fact one’s theory of the present.
[Read More]
Ba'athism and the history of the Left in Iraq
Violence and politics
SINCE THE 1960s the saturation of brutality and violence in Iraq has caused considerable confusion among Leftists in regards to both its political meaning and causes. One cannot fully understand the character of Saddam Hussein’s Arab Ba’ath Socialist Party without taking into account that it achieved political power by systematically killing off the Iraqi Communist Party (ICP) and quelling other political dissent with acts of extreme cruelty. The eight year battle of attrition instigated by Hussein, known as the Iran-Iraq War, caused over half a million Iraqi deaths, and the ethnic cleansing campaigns directed against the Kurds resulted in countless more.
[Read More]
Interview: Ernesto Laclau
CONFRONTING THE CONFUSION and fragmentation that wrought progressive politics in recent decades, Ernesto Laclau’s work attempts to theorize the path to the construction of a radical democratic politics. Drawing on Gramsci’s concept of hegemony to devise his own theory by that name, Laclau describes the processes of social articulation that creates popular political identities. By redefining democratic politics as the construction of hegemony, Laclau reminds political actors of the work necessary to construct the plurality of democratic structures vital to any emancipatory political project.
[Read More]
The Left is dead! Long live the Left!
Vicissitudes of historical consciousness and possibilities for emancipatory social politics today
The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.
—Karl Marx, The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon (1852)
The theorist who intervenes in practical controversies nowadays discovers on a regular basis and to his shame that whatever ideas he might contribute were expressed long ago – and usually better the first time around.
—Theodor W. Adorno, “Sexual Taboos and the Law Today” (1963)
[Read More]