Althusser's Marxism

Althusser's Marxism
This article originally appeared in Die Platypus Review #10 in German.1 It has been translated into English by Clint Montgomery. WHEN IT COMES TO LYOTARD’S POSTMODERN THESIS about the end of grand narratives, from enlightenment to historicism, everybody knows he’s talking about Marx. Politically speaking, no other grand narrative survived the 19th century. For the fate of the enlightenment stood revealed in its stance toward socialism: since the emergence of the workers’ movement, liberalism was left with two options, either curtail its own ideals in cultural pessimism or just straight up make camp with the enemy. [Read More]

Horkheimer on Lenin's "Empiriocriticism"

Max Horkheimer's 1928--29 reaction to Lenin's epistemological polemic _Materialism and Empiriocriticism_

Horkheimer on Lenin's "Empiriocriticism"
This is the first translation from the German-language Platypus Review to appear in the English edition. The original can be found at the above link. Material Basis AMONGST HIS MANUSCRIPTS Max Horkheimer left behind an essay, written in 1928 but unpublished during his lifetime, whose subject is Lenin’s important work Materialism and Empiriocriticism, which had appeared in German translation the year before. The publication of Horkheimer’s response to Lenin was eventually undertaken by Horkheimer’s pupil and successor, Alfred Schmidt in 1985. [Read More]